When it comes to the subject of bank bail ins, most GoldVu readers probably agree with my opinion that the current international financial system is to all intents and purposes broken. It's being kept afloat by increasingly egregious interventions and manipulations by central banks and major money centre banks. There now seems to be a risk that is rising month by the month of another repeated round of client money being taken.
For those unfamiliar with what a bank bail in is, it's where the bank that is holding your money is unable to meet its currently due debt obligations & payments. When such a scenario happens, the bank needs to find cash to cover its payments or it will go bankrupt. That cash will either be given to it by the government (called a bailout) or the bank will have to take a percentage of the cash that sits in your account.
The money that is directly taken from your accounts is called a bank bail in. The bank will twist it into a positive spin by saying "well, if we didn't take x% of your money we would have closed and you would have lost 100% of your money".
So, because the bank is saying that they had your best interest at heart and didn't want you lose all of it, they just helped themselves to some of your hard-earned money. If they really cared about you, then why did they engage in risky financial practices that created a situation where they needed to take your money in the first place? It's just simple greed, not care or concern for your welfare.
This topic is close to my heart, as I live in Cyprus and personally witnessed and lived through the experience of the first officially sanctioned G20 'bank bail in' process in 2013.
It became clear to me in late 2012 that the Cypriot banking sector had dug itself a huge financial hole that was well beyond the national government's financial ability to resolve and that bank depositors' money was very much at risk.
At every opportunity, I tried to warn friends and acquaintances of the dangers, and urged them to reduce their Cypriot bank deposits to a minimum as soon as practical. Most people either laughed off my concerns, or their eyes glazed over with total disbelief, and/or they thought I was a certifiably crazy person.
In the end, I managed to persuade just three people to take action, which they did literally in the last few days before the official declaration of a 'bank holiday.' They collectively saved over $1.5 million. It would be a masterly understatement to say that that those three people, and their families, were very relieved and happy that they had managed to avoid the financial consequences of the bank bail in. It is interesting that I cannot recollect even one of those people that ignored my warnings ever approaching me after the bail in happened, to express regret that they had refused to heed my warning. As the old adage goes: there is nothing stranger than folk.
When the bank holiday was declared, and the final bail in terms agreed and made known, the depositors' reactions were pretty uniform, and understandably included a deep sense of outrage, and stunned disbelief that their bank deposits could be legally seized in such an arbitrary manner.
This sense of outrage was exacerbated by the fact that the banks had regularly been declaring healthy profits in the years leading up to the bail in, and there was little to indicate to those unfamiliar with the financial system, that there was any cause for concern.
What follows is brief extract from my book "FROM WEST TO EAST – The Greatest Transfer of Power and Wealth in the History of Mankind" (Read the Prologue in full on GoldVu).
Quote "
The financial and economic crisis of 2008 resulted in many major banks requiring urgent increases in capital in order to avoid bankruptcy. In the highly stressed atmosphere of the crisis conditions existing at that time, coupled with the lack of any protocol to follow in such extraordinary circumstances, the banks in question were exceptionally provided with increased capital by their respective governments at the expense of the taxpayer.
When the crisis conditions calmed down somewhat in 2009, the G20 decided that a suitable protocol for handling future bank crises must be drawn up and agreed. In April 2009 the Financial Stability Board (FSB) was established as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF); it included all G20 countries, FSF members, and the European Commission. The FSB was based in Basel, Switzerland, the home of the BIS (Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of central banks).
The chairman appointed to head up the FSB was Mark Carney, who at the time was the governor of the Bank of Canada (Canada's central bank). The FSB was tasked with promoting financial stability within the global financial system and making suitable recommendations to the G20 in that regard.
As Carney had already been instrumental in the shaping of the provisions of a bank bail in policy for the Canadian chartered banks, it should be of little surprise that the FSB, in liaison with the IMF and the BIS, sought and received G20 approval to introduce formal bank bail in procedures as a means of restructuring distressed banks in any future bank crisis.
By the G20 adopting bank bail ins rather than bailouts, it got the taxpayer off the hook, but at the expense of any distressed banks' depositors.
The first bank crisis to occur after the bank bail in agreement was approved by the G20 was in Cyprus. A very brief timeline for the Cypriot bank crisis is provided below:
It's important to note the speed with which these events unfolded towards the end of the actual bail-in process.
The Cypriot banks formally requested a bailout back in June 2012. The subsequent bailout talks took several months; then, without warning, the Cypriot government declared a bank holiday after the fact. Thereafter, depositors could only make very limited cash withdrawals from ATMs in accordance with a government decree. The process was not gradual; it was sudden and total.
The primary concerns of the Cyprus Central Bank, bank CEOs, government ministers, and so on, were to (a) maintain depositors' confidence in the banking system right up to the last minute, and (b) to avoid a bank run, thereby ensuring the maximum amount of customer deposits possible were available to fund the actual bail in. That is why no prior warning of an impending bank holiday was provided.
Western banks are generally very highly leveraged, which means that many are unable to absorb much more than a 5 percent hit to their balance sheet without the need to recapitalise. In a time of financial crisis, many banks will run the risk of incurring losses of more than 5 percent of their assets, and taking into account their derivative exposure, their losses will quickly exceed that 5 percent threshold.
The MSM continue to assure the public that the 2008 financial and economic crisis is now firmly behind us; economic activity is picking up steadily, whilst unemployment is on the decline. However, many respected financial commentators in the alternative media of the blogosphere are firmly of the opinion that far from being in recovery mode, behind the scenes:
Are bail ins coming to a bank near you?"
" Unquote
After the bank bail-in, commercial businesses of all types found that suppliers, both local and international had cancelled their credit lines, even for long established business relationships. Almost overnight, importers and local businesses went from receiving anything between 30 days and 120 days to make payments for imports or local supplies, to having to pay for those goods upfront!
To add insult to injury, businesses, and individuals were being pressured by their banks to reduce and/or pay back their credit lines, as well as being requested to increase pledged collateral in support of their credit lines, because existing collateral values had been revised downwards by an appreciable percentage, in view of the financial crisis. Also bear in mind the fact those businesses, and their owners, had just seen a substantial percentage of their bank deposits confiscated by the bank bail in.
In short, there was a sudden and dramatic cash squeeze.
The Cypriot banks were forced by the EU/IMF to significantly tighten up on all aspects of their lending practices. The impact on the local economy was immediate and not surprisingly, extremely negative.
Four years later the economy is showing some tentative signs of recovery. However, that tentative recovery will be short lived when, rather than if, the international financial system implodes again, as a result of the failure of TPTB to address the core issues that caused the 2008 crisis.
It therefore makes sense for people to make pragmatic preparations, according to their disposition, means and situation, so as to be able to ride out a widespread bank holiday of indeterminate duration. Such preparations, amongst others, might include having a suitable stash of cash on hand, water, canned and dry food stored at home, as well as physical gold and/or silver bullion stored outside the banking system in a suitably secure vault and location.
Article by: James S Gibson
Date of article: 04 July 2017
Please note that none of the content within any articles on the GoldVu website are offered as investment advice and should not be construed as such.